Many parents of children with reading disabilities (and some advocates and attorneys) insist that the Wilson Reading System (Wilson) is the only reading method that can help their child learn to read. They claim it’s the scientifically proven method for overcoming dyslexia and other reading disabilities, and thus the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA) supports it.

They’re wrong. And if they take this argument to court, and the school’s experts are well-versed in the research, the school has valid reasons for prefering its methodology, the IEP’s goals and objectives and services are sound,  and the hearing officer or judge believes, like most do, that courts should not overturn a school’s decision about methodology, the parents will likely lose.

Share
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Often, no.

With enthusiasm, dedication, and genuine tears of gratitude, many parents advocate for particular reading programs, programs they claim cured their child’s dyslexia. They’re joined by many teachers and private reading consultants. These proponents—genuine in their beliefs and unbridled enthusiasm for particular programs—ignore these possibilities:

  • Good teaching, rather than the particular program, was responsible.
  • The placebo effect was operating, as it often does. A sugar pill can sometimes be as effective as a brand name pill costing $100.
  • The program works for some children, but only for a few.
  • Other programs would have worked as well, or better.
Share
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,